Fig. 1: Antenna (inset: III. and IV. antennal segment)
Fig. 2: Head dorsal with ocellar triangle
Fig. 3: Pronotum
Fig. 4: Meso- and metanotum
Fig. 5: Fore- and hindwing
Fig. 6: Sternites VI and VII
Fig. 7: Tergites III and IV
Fig. 8: Tergites VIII and IX
ITS-RFLP gel patterns (1&8 ladder, 2 PCR-product, 3 RSAI, 4 HaeIII, 5 MspI, 6 HinfI, 7 AluI)
Fig. 09: Primer pair O1/18J
Fig. 10: Primer pair P1/28Z
Fig. 11: Primer pair TODA1/TODA2
Taeniothrips inconsequens (Uzel, 1895)
Taeniothrips calcaratus Priesner, 1925
Taeniothrips adustus Priesner, 1920
Taeniothrips inconsequens Bagnall, 1916
Physothrips calcaratus Bagnall, 1916
Taeniothrips pyri Hood, 1914
Thrips pyri Trabut, 1911
Physopus pyri Reh, 1909
Euthrips pyri Daniel, 1904
Physopus inconsequens Uzel, 1895
Present taxonomic position:
Family: Thripidae Stephens, 1829
Subfamily: Thripinae (Stephens) Karny, 1921
Genus: Taeniothrips Amyot & Serville, 1843
Species RecognitionGeneral information about the genus Taeniothrips:
This genus has been confused taxonomically with the genus Thrips and many of its species have been synonymized with Thrips. In the 1970’s clarification to separate and define the two genera became established using one optimum character with the genus Thrips containing ctenidia on abdmonial segments V-VIII and Taeniothrips lacking that trait (O’Neill 1972, Mound et al. 1976, Bhatti 1978, 1980). There are currently 17 species recognized in the genus Taeniothrips and may be related to other genera associated with orchids, e.g. Dichromothrips and Sciothrips.
Typical character states of Taenithrips inconsequens:
Mainly brown, mainly pale or yellow, with some darker markings or bicolored
Number of antennal segments: 8
Segment IV - forked sensorium: scarcely extending beyond base of segment V
Segments II and III shape: more or less symmetric
Segments III & IV sensoria: emergent and forked
Base of sensorium on antennal segment VI: no more than 2 times as wide as base of nearest seta
Terminal antennal segments: rarely elongate
Distance between bases of ocellar setae III: less than width of first ocellus
Head shape between compound eyes: not prolonged
Major postocular setae: less than half as long as ocellar setae III
Ocellar setae III on head: arising between hind ocelli, or behind tangent of anterior margin of hind ocelli
Postocular setae I: absent
Surface of head, pronotum and fore legs: without strong reticulate sculpture
Ocellar setae I in front of anterior ocellus: absent
Number of pairs of elongate pronotal setae: 0-3
Number of pairs of elongate posteroangular pronotal setae: 2
Pronotum shape: rectangular
Number of pairs of pronotum posteromarginal minor setae: 1-3
Number of pairs of pronotum anteromarginal minor setae: 2-3
Mesothoracic endofurca: with median spinula
Metanotal median area sculptured lines: transverse at anterior, but with irregular equiangular reticulation near posterior
Metanotal median setae length: longer than lateral metanotal setae
Metanotal median setae position: arising at anterior margin
Metanotum: without campaniform sensilla
Metanotum major sclerite: with two major sclerites, metascutum and metascutellum
Metanotum median area: with at least some equiangular reticulation
Metanotum sculpture: without dominant sculptured triangle medially
Metathoracic endofurca: transverse, sometimes with simple median spinula
Wings: present and more than half as long as abdomen
First vein of forewing: distinct from costal vein
Forewing anterior margin: with setae and cilia but cilia longer than setae
Forewing color: uniformly light brown
Forewing costal fringe of cilia: arising at anterior margin of wing
Forewing costal setae at middle of wing: shorter than median width of wing
Forewing first vein setal row: incomplete, with setae not closely and uniformly spaced
Forewing posterior margin cilia: undulated near apex
Forewing second vein setal row: complete, with setae closely and uniformly spaced
Forewing surface: not reticulate
Forewings: with veins, setae and microtrichia
Fore tibial apex: not extending around fore tarsus
Mid and hind tarsi: with two segments
Pleurotergal discal setae: absent
Abdominal pleurotergites: not covered in microtrichia
Abdominal segment X: never tubular, longitudinally incomplete ventrally in both sexes
Abdominal sternite II: with marginal setae but no discal setae
Abdominal sternite III of female: without glandular areas
Abdominal sternite VII: with marginal setae but no discal setae
Abdominal sternite VII median marginal setae: arising in front of margin
Abdominal sternites IV , V and VI: with marginal setae but no discal setae
Number of lateral marginal setae on abdominal tergite II: 3
Abdominal tergites: without curved wing-retaining setae
Abdominal tergites IV & V median setal pair: much shorter than distance between their bases
Abdominal tergites V-VII: without paired ctenidia, sometimes with irregular microtrichia
Setae on abdominal tergite X: slender
Surface of lateral thirds of abdominal tergites: without regular rows of fine microtrichia
Ctenidia on tergite VIII: not present, but groups of microtrichia
Tergite VIII posteromarginal comb of microtrichia: present, complete medially
Tergite VIII posteromarginal microtrichia: long, slender and regular
The life cycle is driven by the temperature in the north-eastern US where is feeds on the fruit and newly emerging leaves then pupates and over winters in the soil to start a new generation the following year (Stannard, 1968).
Pear, stone fruits, sugar maple, Acer, Facus, Fraxinus, Quercus, Prunus
Erwinia amylovora (fire blight bacteria)
Current known distribution:
Asia, Central and South America, Europe, North America
Taeniothrips inconsequens has been recognized as a serious pest on fruiting trees since 1904 in California later spreading to the ease coast of the US (Stannard, 1968). This species is now recognized as a serious pest in the eastern US on Acer saccharum. The life cycle is driven by the temperature in the north-eastern US where is feeds on the fruit and newly emerging leaves then pupates and over winters in the soil to start a new generation the following year (Stannard, 1968).
Allen, DC, Barnett, CJ, Millers, I & Lachance,
D (1992): Temporal Change (1988-1990) in sugar maple health,
and factors associated with crown condition. - Canadian Journal of
Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 22 (11): 1776-1784.
Bailey, SF (1957): The thrips of California. University of California Press, Berkeley. Bhatti, J. S. (1978): A preliminary revision of Taeniothrips. Oriental Insects 12:157-199.
Bhatti, JS (1980): Species of the genus Thrips from India (Thysanoptera). Systematic Entomology 5:109-166.
Brose, PH, Mccormick, LH & Cameron, EA (1993): Distribution of pear thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) in 3 forest soil drainage classes. - Environmental Entomology 22 (5): 1118-1123.
Brownbridge, M, Adamowicz, A, Skinner, M & Parker, BL (1999): Prevalence of fungal entomopathogens in the life cycle of pear thrips, Taeniothrips inconsequens (Thysanoptera : Thripidae), in Vermont sugar maple forests. - Biological Control 16 (1): 54-59.
Carey, E, Vandriesche, RG, Elkinton, JS, Bellows, TS & Burnham, C (1992): Influence of sugar maple health on fecundity of pear thrips in Massachusetts. - Canadian Entomologist 124 (6): 1129-1138.
Carl, Kp, Yuill, J, Parsch, M & Prior, C (1989): Taeniothrips inconsequens in central Europe and its natural enemies. - CAB International Institute of Biological Control - European Station Report: 1-14.
Coli, WM, Hollingsworth, CS & Hosmer, TA (1997): Seasonal and vertical variation in activity of pear thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) within stands of sugar maple. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 27 (5): 667-673.
Coli, WM, Hollingsworth, CS & Maier, CT (1992): Traps for monitoring pear thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) in maple stands and apple orchards. - Journal of Economic Entomology 85 (6): 2258-2262.
Ellsworth, DS, Tyree, MT, Parker, BL & Skinner, M (1994): Photosynthesis and water-use efficiency of sugar maple (Acer-Saccharum) in relation to pear thrips defoliation. - Tree Physiology 14 (6): 619-632.
Felland, CM, Teulon, DAJ, Hull, LA & Polk, DF (1995): Distribution and management of thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) on nectarine in the Mid-Atlantic Region. - Journal of Economic Entomology 88 (4): 1004-1011.
Gardescu, S (2003): Herbivory, disease, and mortality of sugar maple seedlings. - Northeastern Naturalist 10 (3): 253-268.
Kolb, TE & McCormick, LH (1993): Etiology of sugar maple decline in 4 Pennsylvania stands. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 23 (11): 2395-2402.
Kolb, TE, Mccormick, LH & Shumway, DL (1991): Physiological-responses of pear thrips-damaged sugar maples to light and water-stress. - Tree Physiology 9 (3): 401-413.
Kolb, TE, McCormick, LH, Simons, EE & Jeffery, DJ (1992): Impacts of pear thrips damage on root carbohydrate, sap, and crown characteristics of sugar maples in a Pennsylvania sugarbush. - Forest Science 38 (2): 381-392.
Kolb, TE & Teulon, DAJ (1991): Relationship between sugar maple budburst phenology and pear thrips damage. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 21 (7): 1043-1048.
Kolb, TE & Teulon, DAJ (1992): Effects of temperature during bud burst on pear thrips damage to sugar maple. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 22 (8): 1147-1150.
Leskey, TC, Teulon, DAJ & Cameron, EA (1997): Effects of temperature and sugar maple pollen on oviposition and longevity of pear thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). - Environmental Entomology 26 (3): 566-571.
Lovett, GM & Hubbell, JG (1991): Effects of ozone and acid mist on foliar leaching from eastern white-pine and sugar maple. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 21 (6): 794-802.
Moritz G, Morris DC, Mound LA (2001): ThripsID - Pest thrips of the world. ACIAR and CSIRO Publishing Collingwood, Victoria, Australia, CDROM ISBN 1 86320 296 X.
Moritz G, Mound LA, Morris DC, Goldarazena A (2004): Pest thrips of the world - an identification and information system using molecular and microscopial methods. CBIT, University of Queensland,CDROM ISBN 1-86499-781-8.
Mound, LA, Morison, GD, Pitkin, BR & Palmer, JM (1976): Handbooks for the identification of British insects-Thysanoptera 1(11):1-79. Royal Entomological Society of London.
Mound, LA & Kibby, G (1998): Thysanoptera: An identification guide, (2nd edition). CAB International, Wallingford and New York, 70pp.
Mound, LA & Marullo, R (1996): The thrips of Central and South America: An Introduction (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Associated Publishers, Gainesville.
Nakahara, S (1994): The Genus Thrips Linnaeus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of the New World. USDA Agricultural Research Service Technical bulletin No. 1822.
O’Neill, K (1972): Mycterothrips Trybom, a review of the North American species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 74:275-282.
Parker, BL, Grehan, JR & Skinner, M (1992): Method for extracting pear thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from torest soil. - Journal of Economic Entomology 85 (3): 865-869.
Parker, BL & Skinner, M (1993): Field-evaluation of traps for monitoring emergence of pear thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). - Journal of Economic Entomology 86 (1): 46-52.
Parker, BL, Skinner, M & Lewis, T (1991): Towards understanding Thysanoptera. Proceedings International Conference on Thrips, February 21-23, 1989, Burlington, Vermont USA, USDA, General Technical Report NE 147.
Rieske, LK & Raffa, KF (2003): Evaluation of visual and olfactory cues for sampling three thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in deciduous forests of the Northern United States. - J. Economic Entomology 96 (6): 777-782.
Rio, RVM & Cameron, EA (2000): Heterorhabditis bacteriophora: Seasonal dynamics and distribution in a stand of sugar maple, Acer saccharum. - Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 75 (1): 36-40.
Shumway, DL, Teulon, DAJ & Kolb, TE (1991): Identification of thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) feeding sites on sugar maple leaves. - Journal of Economic Entomology 84 (6): 1771-1773.
Skinner, M & Parker, BL (1992): Vertical-distribution of pear thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) in forest soils. - Environmental Entomology 21 (6): 1258-1266.
Skinner, M & Parker, BL (1996): Emergence of pear thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and its relation to foliar damage. - Environmental Entomology 25 (2): 350-358.
Skinner, M, Parker, BL & Bergdahl, DR (1991): Verticillium lecanii, isolated from larvae of pear thrips Taeniothrips inconsequens, in Vermont. - Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 58: 157-163.
Stannard, LJ (1968): The thrips, or Thysanoptera, of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 29: 215-552.
Teulon, DAJ & Cameron, EA (1995): Within-tree distribution of pear thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) in sugar maple. - Environmental Entomology 24 (2): 233-238.
Teulon, DAJ, Cameron, EA & Nakahara, S (1999): Thrips (Thysanoptera) diversity in a sugar maple (Aceraceae) plantation. - Canadian Entomologist 131 (5): 629-633.
Teulon, DAJ, Groninger, JW. & Cameron, EA (1994): Distribution and host associations of Taeniothrips inconsequens (Uzel) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environmental Entomologist 23: 587-611
Teulon, DAJ, Leskey, TC & Cameron, EA (1998): Pear thrips Taeniothrips inconsequens (Thysanoptera : Thripidae) life history and population dynamics in sugar maple in Pennsylvania. - Bulletin of Entomological Research 88 (1): 83-92.
Vogelmann, JE (1990): Comparison between two vegetation indices for measuring different types of forest damage in the north-eastern United States. - Int.J.Remote Sensing 11: 2281-2297.
Vogelmann, JE & Rock, BN (1989): Use of thematic mapper data for the detection of forest damage caused by the pear thrips. - Remote Sens. Environ. 30: 217-225. .
Mound, LA (2005): Thysanoptera (Thrips) of the World - A Checklist. http://www.ento.csiro.au/thysanoptera/worldthrips.html